R3i Editorials

July 2023
Call to action on residual stroke risk
Prof. Jean-Charles Fruchart, Prof. Michel Hermans, Prof. Pierre Amarenco

Stroke is the leading cause of disability worldwide and the second leading cause of death. According to latest data from the Global Burden of Disease Study, the absolute number of strokes has increased by 70% over the last three decades (1990 to 2019), with an even higher increase among those aged over 70 years 1. Additionally, there are sex disparities in stroke epidemiology. While men are at higher risk of stroke throughout most of their life, the incidence of stroke in women increases with age, especially after 85 years. Given their longer life expectancy, women therefore account for a larger proportion of stroke morbidity and mortality, despite advances that have been made in therapeutic management 2. Thus, the high global burden of stroke and associated disability– increasing as populations age – merits renewed focus on preventive management.

This call to action also applies to the management of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke. Recent data from the TIA registry, an international, prospective, observational registry of patients with a recent (within the previous 7 days) TIA or minor ischaemic stroke highlights the challenge of managing residual stroke risk. Five years after a TIA or minor stroke, these patients have a substantial burden of disability largely predicted by modifiable risk factors. Notably, among those with concomitant diabetes, the risk of recurrent disabling or fatal stroke was more than doubled 3. Furthermore, patients with pre-existing atherosclerosis were at much higher risk (by 2-3-fold) of major vascular events within 5 years than those without atherosclerosis 4.

To some extent, action to reduce residual stroke risk is hampered by the paucity of clinical trials, as highlighted by Professor Pierre Amarenco at the recent International Steering Committee Meeting of the Residual Risk Reduction Initiative in Marrakech, Morocco in February this year. Despite this, there are important lessons to be gained from the landmark studies that have been conducted. The Treat Stroke to Target (TST) study showed that substantial lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), both in terms of the target value and the magnitude of LDL-C reduction, was important (5-7). Targeting atherogenic dyslipidemia – the combination of elevated triglycerides and low plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol which is prevalent in diabetes – may offer additional benefit; in the TST trial, patients with stroke, atherosclerosis and atherogenic dyslipidemia obtained a 36% risk reduction in the primary outcome 5.

Furthermore, intervention against other modifiable risk factors, including inflammation, oxidative stress and glucose dysmetabolism warrants evaluation. Given its profile of activity, the selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator (SPPARMα) pemafibrate may be an appropriate agent to test this. Pemafibrate may also have value as part of a disease-modifying strategy to reduce post-stroke cognitive impairment.

While we have made major advances in the management of residual risk among coronary heart disease patients, much remains to be done to reduce recurrent stroke risk and associated cognitive disorders. We await the results of new trials, such as RIISC-THETIS (Evaluation of Low Dose Colchicine and Ticagrelor in Prevention of Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Stroke Due to Atherosclerosis) targeting residual inflammatory and thrombotic risk 8, to gain new insights that will help to reduce residual stroke risk and improve brain health.

References

  1. GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol 2021;20:795-820.
    2. Eriksson M, Åsberg S, Stibrant Sunnerhagen K, von Euler M. Sex Differences in Stroke Care and Outcome 2005-2018: Observations From the Swedish Stroke Register. Stroke 2021;52:3233-3242.
    3. Hobeanu C, Lavallée PC, Charles H et al. Risk of subsequent disabling or fatal stroke in patients with transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke: an international, prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2022;21:889-898.
    4. Lavallée PC, Charles H, Albers GW et al. Effect of atherosclerosis on 5-year risk of major vascular events in patients with transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke: an international prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2023;22:320-329.
    5. Amarenco P, Kim JS, Labreuche J, et al. A comparison of two LDL cholesterol targets after ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2020;3821:9
    6. Amarenco P, Kim JS, Labreuche J, et al. Impact of lower versus higher LDL cholesterol targets on cardiovascular events after ischemic stroke in patients with diabetes. Diabetes 2021;70:1807-1815.
    7. Amarenco P, Kim JS, Labreuche J, et al. Yield of dual therapy with statin and ezetimibe in the Treat Stroke to Target Trial. Stroke 2022; 53:3260-3267.
    8. Evaluation of Low Dose Colchicine and Ticagrelor in Prevention of Ischemic Stroke in Patients With Stroke Due to Atherosclerosis (RIISC-THETIS). Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05476991